|
Interpersonal compatibility is the long-term interaction between two or more individuals in terms of the ease and comfort of communication. ==Existing concepts== Although various concepts of interpersonal compatibility have existed from ancient times (see, e.g., Plato's ''Lysis''), no general theory of interpersonal compatibility has been proposed in psychology. Existing concepts are contradictory in many details, beginning with the central point—whether compatibility is caused by matching psychological parameters or by their complementarity. At the same time, the idea of interpersonal compatibility is analyzed in non-scientific fields (see, e.g., Astrological compatibility). Among existing psychological tools for studying and/or measuring interpersonal compatibility, the following are noteworthy: * A test of interpersonal compatibility proposed by Timothy Leary * A three-factor hypothesis (inclusion, control, and affection/openness) by William Schutz (further developed into FIRO-B questionnaire) * Hans Jurgen Eysenck's hypothesis on compatibility between temperaments * Social psychological research on similarity of interests and attitudes * Compatibility test pamphlets of the 1930s and early computer dating of the 1950s, developed by George W. Crane * Hypothesis of compatibility between personality attitudes by Russell Ackoff and Frederick Edmund Emery,〔1972, On Purposeful Systems: An Interdisciplinary Analysis of Individual and Social Behavior as a System of Purposeful Events, By Russell Ackoff and Frederick Edmund Emery, Aldine-Atherton: Chicago.〕 * DMO tool by Lyudmila Sobchik (DMO stands for ''Interpersonal relations diagnostics'', Russian: ') Socionics has proposed a theory of intertype relationships between psychological types based on a modified version of C.G. Jung's theory of psychological types. Communication between types is described using the concept of information metabolism proposed by Antoni Kępiński. Socionic data are much more representative than, e.g., those of Ackoff and Emery. Socionics allocates 16 types of the relations — from most attractive and comfortable up to disputed. The understanding of a nature of these relations helps to solve a number of problems of the interpersonal relations, including aspects of psychological and sexual compatibility. The researches of married couples by Aleksandr Bukalov et al., have shown that the family relations submit to the laws, which are opened by socionics. The study of socionic type allocation in casually selected married couples confirmed the main rules of the theory of intertype relations in socionics.〔''Bukalov A.V., Karpenko O.B., Chykyrysova G.V.''(Statistics of intertype relationships in married couples )〕〔''Bukalov A.V., Karpenko O.B., Chykyrysova G.V.''(Socionics: the effective theory of the mental structure and the interpersonal relations forecasting )〕 So, the dual relations (full addition) make 45% and the intraquadral relations make 64% of investigated couples. Alternative hypotheses of intertype relationships were later proposed by adherents of MBTI (D. Keirsey's hypothesis of compatibility between Keirsey temperaments). Neither of these hypotheses are commonly accepted in the Myers–Briggs type theory. MBTI in Russia is often confused with socionics, although the 16 types in these theories are described differently and do not correlate exactly. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「interpersonal compatibility」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|